• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Geographical

Geographical

Official magazine of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG)

  • Home
  • Briefing
  • Science & Environment
  • Climate
    • Climatewatch
  • Wildlife
  • Culture
  • Geopolitics
    • Geopolitical hotspots
  • Study Geography
    • University directory
    • Masters courses
    • Course guides
      • Climate change
      • Environmental science
      • Human geography
      • Physical geography
    • University pages
      • Aberystwyth University
      • Brunel University
      • Cardiff University
      • University of Chester
      • Edge Hill University
      • The University of Edinburgh
      • Newcastle University
      • Nottingham Trent University
      • Oxford Brookes University
      • The University of Plymouth
      • Queen Mary University of London
    • Geography careers
      • Charity/non-profit
      • Education & research
      • Environment
      • Finance & consulting
      • Government and Local Government
    • Applications and advice
  • Quizzes
  • Magazine
    • Issue previews
    • Subscribe
    • Manage My Subscription
    • Special Editions
    • Podcasts
    • Geographical Archive
    • Book reviews
    • Crosswords
    • Advertise with us
  • Subscribe
    • Direct Debit Changes

New study compares benefits of tree planting versus natural colonisation in UK woodlands

28 August 2025
3 minutes

A mixture of natural colonisation and planting is the best solution for increasing canopy cover. Image: RBG Kew

Concerns raised whether UK forests are genetically diverse enough to deal with climate change, pests and disease


By Victoria Heath

Scientists hope to achieve a canopy cover of 16.5 per cent over England by 2050, aiming to halt nature’s decline. Against the backdrop of such demands, policymakers are keen to know whether natural colonisation or tree planting is the way forward to achieving this goal.

In a new study published today in the journal Evolutionary Applications, scientists from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and Forest Research, have begun to answer that dilemma. The study has compared genetic diversity and comparative tree health of young British woodlands, revealing the pros and cons of planting versus natural colonisation. 


Enjoying this article? Check out our related reads:

  • Review: Great Kingdoms of Africa by John Parker
  • Review: Tracks On The Ocean by Sara Caputo
  • Are wildfires good for the environment?
  • The rainforest coming to Devon
  • Has COP16 achieved anything?

To draw their conclusions, scientists examined sites with naturally colonising and planted English oak and silver birch to compare the condition of young trees and assess the small differences in DNA between tree populations.

Genetic diversity is crucial if the UK’s forests are to thrive, as although many trees will undoubtedly fail, some will have the built-in resilience to pathogens and stressors such as drought, that can be passed on to future generations.

Researchers found both planting and natural colonisation can create healthy and diverse forests when analysed at the local level, reinforcing recent findings in a Surrey woodland where natural selection was evolving resilience to ash dieback. However, natural colonisation on its own is not a solution to increasing canopy cover, due to the small and fragmented nature of UK woodlands.

Genetic diversity is vital for tree populations to thrive amid a warming planet. Image: RBG Kew

One proposal that will be put forward to the government, alongside the seed supply and nursery sector, is prioritising collecting seed from a wider range of parent trees from a variety of regions, helping to balance genetic diversity. This comes after researchers found that planted trees commonly originate from just a handful of seed sources, contributing to a lack of variability among planted woodlands.

Climate projections for the UK suggest trees planted today will face conditions that are drier and multiple degrees centigrade hotter than today. Additionally, they will face increased risks from pests and diseases.

As such, it is vital that a holistic approach, combining targeted tree planting with natural colonisation, is adopted.

‘Moving forward, it’s not just about how many trees we plant, but making sure the ones we plant are equipped to thrive in today’s environment and that their offspring can keep pace with the environmental challenges of the future,’ said postdoctoral researcher in plant health and adaptation at RBG Kew and first author of the paper Dr Guillermo Friis.

Themes Briefing

Protected by Copyscape

Primary Sidebar

OUR UK DIRECT DEBITS ARE CHANGING
SPRING SALE

Geographical subscriptions

GEOGRAPHICAL WEEKLY LOGOFREE - Sign up to get global stories, told well, straight to your inbox every Friday

Popular Now

On The Ground: The new podcast from Geographical

On The Ground: The new podcast from Geographical

QUIZ: Country Spotlight – Sweden

QUIZ: Country Spotlight – Sweden

Out now: April Geographical Magazine

Out now: April Geographical Magazine

QUIZ: Geography Trivia

QUIZ: Geography Trivia

QUIZ: Country Shapes – Hard

QUIZ: Country Shapes – Hard

Footer

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • TikTok
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Geographical print magazine cover

Published in the UK since 1935, Geographical is the official magazine of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

Informative, authoritative and educational, this site’s content covers a wide range of subject areas, including geography, culture, wildlife and exploration, illustrated with superb photography.

Click Here for SUBSCRIPTION details

Want to access Geographical on your tablet or smartphone? Press the Apple, Android or PC/Mac image below to download the app for your device

Footer Apple Footer Android Footer Mac-PC

More from Geographical

  • Subscriptions
  • Get our Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2026 · Site by Syon Media