• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Geographical

Geographical

Official magazine of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG)

  • Home
  • Briefing
  • Science & Environment
  • Climate
    • Climatewatch
  • Wildlife
  • Culture
  • Geopolitics
    • Geopolitical hotspots
  • Study Geography
    • University directory
    • Masters courses
    • Course guides
      • Climate change
      • Environmental science
      • Human geography
      • Physical geography
    • University pages
      • University of Aberdeen
      • Aberystwyth University
      • Cardiff University
      • University of Chester
      • Edge Hill University
      • The University of Edinburgh
      • Oxford Brookes University
      • Queen Mary University of London
    • Geography careers
      • Charity/non-profit
      • Education & research
      • Environment
      • Finance & consulting
      • Government and Local Government
    • Applications and advice
  • Quizzes
  • Magazine
    • Issue previews
    • Subscribe
    • Manage My Subscription
    • Special Editions
    • Podcasts
    • Geographical Archive
    • Book reviews
    • Crosswords
    • Advertise with us
  • Subscribe

Ecocide becoming punishable by law across the world

26 August 2023
3 minutes

Helicopter in Vietnam on defoliation mission spraying agent orange in a jungle area near the Mekong Delta
Helicopter in Vietnam on a defoliation mission spraying agent orange in a jungle area near the Mekong Delta. Image: Shutterstock

Ecocide is increasingly being written into law, with reparations given to local communities, land and rivers


So severe was the blight of dead trees and withering crops after the US blasted Vietnam with Agent Orange in 1972 that the former Prime Minister of Sweden, Olof Palme, believed the Nixon Administration was culpable of ‘ecocide’. Five million acres of forests were defoliated, yet no clear legal mechanism existed through which to challenge the act. Fast forward 50 years and a movement to enshrine the crime of ‘ecocide’ in international law is gathering pace.

At 2021’s COP26 in Glasgow, the world’s first global citizen’s assembly put forth its view that international courts should recognise ecocide. If that were to happen, it would join genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression on the list of the world’s most serious crimes enforceable under the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) of The Hague.

However, any amendment to the Rome Statute must first be proposed by one of the countries that actually signed it. It then needs to be approved by two-thirds of at least 92 of the others. There are countries willing to lead the charge: In December 2021, a strong majority in a Belgian court voted to recognise ecocide as an international crime, demanding that the Belgian government propose the Rome Statute amendment. France wrote ecocide into national law back in August 2021, enforcing up to 10 years imprisonment for offences which ‘cause serious and lasting damage to health, flora and fauna or the quality of the air, soil or water’. The European Union has encouraged its Member States to promote ecocide’s official listing as a domestic crime, and to campaign for its recognition within international courts.

Related links:

  • New bill proposed to penalise ‘ecocide’ in Mexico
  • Holding to account: the rising power of climate litigation
  • Review: Planting Clues by David J Gibson
  • Why does geography matter in the world of law?
  • The problem with CITES, the convention to protect endangered wildlife


According to Philippe Sands, a lawyer who appeared on a panel that published a draft definition of the term to the UN in June 2021, the shared environment has for too long been missing from the international criminal courts’ mandate. ‘All crimes punishable by the ICC focus on the protection of the human being. There’s a gap,’ he says. Sands takes inspiration from two legal figures who conceptualised the legal bounds of genocide and crimes against humanity: Hersch Lauterpacht and Raphael Lemkin. ‘They were motivated to create a legal setting in which for the first time, those who engaged in these appalling acts would know they were at risk of criminal indictment under international and domestic law, so it would have a preventative effect.’

Similarly, proponents believe ecocide could help avoid corporate and political immunity from environmental crimes and ensure that individuals such as CEOs or political figures are held accountable.

Realists, as even Sands describes himself, point to some limitations. Firstly, ecocide will likely be subject to the same frustrations that stymie efforts to stop other international crimes from occurring. While genocide has been an international crime for 75 years following the Nuremberg trials in 1945, many argue that acts falling under its definition still take place: against the Rohingya of Myanmar and against the Uyghurs of China, for example. Second, if ecocide is adopted by the ICC, notable absences to the Rome Statute, including China, America, and Russia, could limit the law’s penetration.

Colourful traditional celebration of St. Peter in the indigenous Kichwa community of Peguche, in the city of Otavalo, Ecuador.
Colourful traditional celebration of St Peter in the indigenous Kichwa community of Peguche, in the city of Otavalo, Ecuador. Image: Shutterstock

Nonetheless, even if ecocide is not preventative, its recognition as an international crime would imbue the ICC with the ability to award or order reparations to its victims. This is not without precedent. In 2012, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights decreed that reforestation programmes be awarded to the Kichwa Indigenous community of Ecuador, whose livelihoods were damaged by an oil company’s illegal exploration of the land.

So, too, could the move have an important symbolic effect. ‘I have worked with the Yazidi community in Northern Iraq and Syria, focusing on the crime of genocide,’ says Sands. ‘Why genocide? Because in seeking to prevent the destruction of groups, genocide as a crime recognises the right of a community to exist. You’ve got the exact same thing here with ecocide; the international law would recognise the natural environment itself as a thing worth looking after.

Filed Under: Science & Environment Tagged With: Instagram, Worldwatch

Protected by Copyscape

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Geographical Magazine from just £4.99

Geographical subscriptions

Sign up to our newsletter and get the best of Geographical direct to your inbox

Popular Now

Workers unload a cargo of smoked fish at the train station in Luena, Angola, more than 700 kilometres from Lobito on the coast

The Lobito Corridor: the new scramble for critical minerals

Small ship cruise lines such as Swan Hellenic are taking the lead on sustainability

Can the cruise industry navigate a sustainable future?

Ocean waters with horizon in background

Geo explainer: What is albedo – and why does it matter so…

The Maud Rise polynya in 2017, roughly the same size as Switzerland

Phenomena: Polar polynyas

QUIZ: Country Spotlight – Papua New Guinea

QUIZ: Country Spotlight – Papua New Guinea

Footer

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • TikTok
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Geographical print magazine cover

Published in the UK since 1935, Geographical is the official magazine of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

Informative, authoritative and educational, this site’s content covers a wide range of subject areas, including geography, culture, wildlife and exploration, illustrated with superb photography.

Click Here for SUBSCRIPTION details

Want to access Geographical on your tablet or smartphone? Press the Apple, Android or PC/Mac image below to download the app for your device

Footer Apple Footer Android Footer Mac-PC

More from Geographical

  • Subscriptions
  • Get our Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 · Site by Syon Media