Changing climate: new refugee visa?

Changing climate: new refugee visa?
20 Jan
New Zealand becomes the first country to propose humanitarian visas for ‘climate change refugees’

New Zealand could become the first country to offer visas to families threatened by the effects of climate change. ‘There might be a new, experimental humanitarian visa category for people from the Pacific who are displaced by rising seas stemming from climate change,’ James Shaw, climate change minister and leader of the NZ Green Party, told Radio New Zealand.

If legislated, the government would offer 100 visas per year under a new climate change humanitarian category. It would be aimed chiefly at populations of neighbouring Pacific islands.

The proposal follows the rejection of two refugee applications made by families from the low-lying island of Tuvalu. Their applications were rejected on the grounds that they did not meet the definition of a ‘refugee’ under the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees, which describes a refugee as someone unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of persecution.

The definition does not account for long-term climate change impacts, such as rising sea levels, nor short-term disasters, such as tropical storms. The aim of the visa would be to address the legal gap.

Atle Solberg, head of the Nansen Initiative Secretariat, which aims to build consensus among states about how to address displacement, says ‘we welcome this proposal by New Zealand and hope that it will encourage other countries to account for similar gaps in their humanitarian visa categories. While it is largely symbolic, it reflects a growing global understanding there need to be better protections not only for victims of climate change, but victims of all kinds of natural disasters.’

To that end, the initiative prefers the term displaced person rather than refugee . ‘Disasters cause displacement,’ says Solberg, ‘and that can happen slowly, quickly, temporarily or permanently and “displaced persons” covers these nuances’.

In 1990, the very first Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report  warned that the worst effects of climate may be those on human migration. So far, there has been little appetite among states to create legal obligations towards those movements. ‘It is a conversation that is growing louder, but we are starting to see these changes in migration now,’ says Solberg. ‘The clock is ticking.’ 

This was published in the January 2018 edition of Geographical magazine.

Related items

Geographical Week

Get the best of Geographical delivered straight to your inbox every Friday.


Subscribe Today


Aberystwyth University University of Greenwich The University of Winchester




Travel the Unknown


Like longer reads? Try our in-depth dossiers that provide a comprehensive view of each topic

  • National Clean Air Day
    For National Clean Air Day, Geographical brings together stories about air pollution and the kind of solutions needed to tackle it ...
    The Air That We Breathe
    Cities the world over are struggling to improve air quality as scandals surrounding diesel car emissions come to light and the huge health costs of po...
    Diabetes: The World at Risk
    Diabetes is often thought of as a ‘western’ problem, one linked to the developed world’s overindulgence in fatty foods and chronic lack of physi...
    The Nuclear Power Struggle
    The UK appears to be embracing nuclear, a huge U-turn on government policy from just two years ago. Yet this seems to be going against the grain globa...
    When the wind blows
    With 1,200 wind turbines due to be built in the UK this year, Mark Rowe explores the continuing controversy surrounding wind power and discusses the e...


NEVER MISS A STORY - follow Geographical

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.