Our directory of things of interest

University Directory

What the media misses

Al Gore, Angela Merkel and a translator at a press conference after a meeting with the German Chancellor Al Gore, Angela Merkel and a translator at a press conference after a meeting with the German Chancellor 360
25 Mar
When the IPCC’s climate change findings are reported in the media, crucial points are often overlooked

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) produces regular reports on the latest scientific evidence for climate change, but the media may be missing important parts of the story, according to research from the University of Exeter.

TV, Twitter and newspapers were examined to see how the IPCC’s climate change evidence was reported in the US and the UK.

Ten ‘frames’ were used to categorise the ways stories were reported, with certain frames more popular than others.

‘Morality, ethics and health are hardly used, even though it would be quite easy – especially, for example with the poor air quality we’ve had recently – to frame the climate change story in terms of health,’ Dr Saffron O’Neill, lead author on the research told Geographical.

Settled Science
Political or Ideological Struggle
Role of Science
Uncertain Science
Morality & Ethics

The frames that tend to be most popular are also those that have been shown in previous research to make the public more disengaged with the issue.

‘There are very well worn paths, such as duelling experts, where a climate change scientist faces a climate change sceptic,’ adds O’Neill.

UK media features five times more reporting on climate change than US media. When climate change does feature in the US, the framing is more partisan, O’Neill says. ‘Climate change is more of a political issue in the US, while in the UK we have consensus through legislation, such as the 2008 Climate Change Act,’ she adds.

Different strands to IPCC research are often overlooked as well. The organisation’s reports are divided between three working groups: Working Group 1 deals with the physical scientific aspects of climate change; Working Group 2 covers impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; while Working Group 3 deals with mitigation.

The first two working groups receive more media attention, according to the research. Work Group 3 tends to be overshadowed while 1 and 2 are discussed in terms of ‘uncertain science’ and ‘disaster’ respectively.

‘Now that we’ve been able to map the frames that media outlets use to report upon the IPCC, the next step in our research is to experimentally examine the psychological impacts that these different media frames have on media consumers,’ says Dr Tim Kurz, a social psychologist on the team.

The team hopes to make recommendations to the IPCC for future communications, and to analyse how the IPCC’s findings are reported in the Chinese media.

This research appears in Nature Climate Change

Related items

NEVER MISS A STORY - Follow Geographical on Social

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.

More articles in NATURE...


An overlap between populations of grizzly bears and Indigenous groups…


Climate change is having a huge impact on the oceans,…


The first COP26 draft agreement has been released


Marco Magrini explores the complex issue of carbon markets –…


The youth found marching outside the COP26 conference in Glasgow…


Energy day at COP26 was all about coal. Marco Magrini…


The world is reliant on the climate models that forecast…


Geographical editor, Katie Burton, spends the day at COP26: finance…


Lawyers are using the power of the courts to challenge…


Mike Robinson, chief executive of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society…


Will China's climate pledges be enough to achieve Xi Jinping's…


Net zero. It’s the phrase that polarises scientists and environmental…