Our directory of things of interest

University Directory

3D printing is helping museums repatriate and decolonise

  • Written by  Myrsini Samaroudi, Karina Rodriguez Echavarria
  • Published in Cultures
3D printing is helping museums repatriate and decolonise
12 Dec
2019
Can 3D printing play a role in enabling museums to ‘decolonise’ and return artefacts to their countries of origin? These researchers think so

Manchester Museum recently returned items taken from Australia more than 100 years ago to Aboriginal leaders, the latest move in an ongoing debate over calls to ‘repatriate’ museum artefacts to their countries of origin.

Get Geographical delivered to your door!
signup buttonAs we brace ourselves on our personal islands, it can be hard to picture the processes of the planet continuing to whir. Marooned in our homes, it’s vital that we stay positive, motivated and informed. Geographical is committed to helping you explore the world from the comfort of your sofa. Get the world delivered to your door, with Geographical.

Subscribe today to Geographical’s monthly print and digital magazine and save 30% off the cover price! 

It’s part of a wider discussion over to what degree museums need to reform and ‘decolonise’ away from displaying collections that were gathered or stolen from other countries during the colonial era, in a way that portrays foreign cultures as strange or inferior and other nations as unsuitable possessors of the world’s cultural heritage and knowledge. Major institutions, including the British Museum and the Victoria & Albert Museum, have been caught up in the debate.

One way forward may be found in digital technologies that can enable people to access representations of other cultures in fair, interesting ways, without cultural institutions needing to hold on to controversial artefacts. For example, with 3D imaging and 3D printing we can produce digital and physical copies of artefacts, allowing visitors to study and interact with them more closely than ever before.

Copying artefacts

Copying artefacts has a surprisingly long history. Many ancient Greek statues that we have today are actually Roman copies made hundreds of years after the originals. Famous Renaissance artists’ workshops regularly produced copies of artwork. In the 19th century, museums produced copies through processes that involved making a mould of the original item, such as casting and electrotyping. The famous diplodocus skeleton ‘Dippy’ actually exists as a number of copies in museums all over the world.

shutterstock 213397528A copy of Myron’s Discobolus is situated at the Vatican Museums in Rome

Today, digital technology has democratised the art of copying so it isn’t limited to big museums with generous budgets or top experts with specialist knowledge. Accessible digitisation technologies, such as photogrammetry and 3D scanning, can digitally record the shape of objects to a good degree of accuracy. And 3D printing and cutting machines can physically reproduce this digital information at an affordable cost.

3D copies can be touched and handled by visitors and can also be customised in shape, material and size. What’s more, digital files of artefacts can be shared online and replicas can be printed in other parts of the world. And most importantly, physically printing a copy from a digital image doesn’t depend on whether the original artefact still exists or not.

Some governments and institutions have supported the creation of copies by adopting these technologies. These include, just to name a few, the prehistoric cave engravings in Lascaux IV in France, Jackson Pollock’s 3D poured painting Alchemy, and the 900-year-old Signing Oak Tree from Windsor Great Park near London.

Democratising and repatriating heritage

Once the digital information from an artefact is produced and shared, the knowledge the artefact represents is no longer locked up in a single museum and can potentially be accessed by many more people. Sceptics might argue that the value of the artefact cannot be reproduced by these means. But 3D technologies open up the possibility for democratising cultural heritage and creating alternative meanings by different groups of people.

3D technologies can also support museums to adapt to changing social, political, financial, environmental and other challenges. For instance, creating physical copies allows museums to repatriate artefacts to their communities of origin, or to display objects without having to transport them across the world. It can also be a starting point for talking to different communities about repatriation and decolonisation. All these actions can support museums through their transformation from colonial institutions to more modern and open organisations, helping them to become less bound to ‘original’ artefacts.

For example, the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in the US has worked closely with the Tlingit native community of southeast Alaska, which requested the repatriation of several objects that were sacred to them. One of the most important objects was the Killer Whale clan crest hat, which the museum digitised and made an accurate replica of, before returning the original to the community.

3D copies have even been deployed in repatriation activism without the official involvement of museums or their approval. For the project Nefertiti Hack, artists Nora Al-Badri and Jan Nikolai Nelles claimed that they secretly scanned the bust of Egyptian queen Nefertiti, held by the Neues Museum in Berlin, and freely released the 3D data online. A 3D replica of Nefertiti’s bust was also 3D printed and exhibited in Cairo. The artists argued their intention was to return Nefertiti to her homeland and criticised the colonialist practices of Western museums.

Moving forward

The repatriation debate is forcing museums to rethink what and who they are for and how they can best serve society.

Some museums have taken decisions to return artefacts to their homeland, others to organise exhibitions dedicated to indigenous voices. Yet, in most cases, these efforts are scattered, or one-off events still infused with colonialist spirit. A more concerted effort to use 3D copying technologies could help overcome this.

Some might argue that original artefacts have an ‘aura’ that is impossible to recreate, and that looking at a copy just isn’t the same. But simply visiting a museum or a cultural heritage site is an authentic experience in its own way. And this doesn’t always have to depend on seeing ‘original’ objects, as long as the museum is honest about its exhibitions and purposes. In future, museums will focus more on the experience of cultural heritage, while promoting universal values, regardless of where the artefacts are.

Myrsini Samaroudi is a PhD Candidate at the School of Computing, Engineering & Maths at the University of Brighton,  Karina Rodriguez Echavarria is a Principal Lecturer at the University of Brighton

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

geo line break v3

Free eBooks - Geographical Newsletter

Get the best of Geographical delivered straight to your inbox by signing up to our weekly newsletter and get a free collection of eBooks!

geo line break v3

Related items

Julysub 2020

geo line break v3

Free eBooks - Geographical Newsletter

geo line break v3

geo line break v3

University of Winchester

geo line break v3

EDUCATION PARTNERS

Aberystwyth University University of Greenwich The University of Derby

TRAVEL PARTNERS

Ponant

Silversea

Travel the Unknown

NEVER MISS A STORY - Follow Geographical on Social

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.

More articles in PEOPLE...

I’m a Geographer

Rosemary Brown is a freelance journalist. In 2014, she followed…

Development

With widespread antibiotic resistance looming, researchers are attempting to create…

Cultures

Following the toppling of Bristol’s Edward Colston statue, Geographical looks…

Development

A new study from the University of Bristol has successfully…

Development

As the world pauses to reflect on biodiversity protection, one…

I’m a Geographer

Danny Dorling is an author and professor of geography at Oxford…

Development

A newly discovered microbe could uncover how soil absorbs carbon…

Explorers

A single entry in a 118-year-old Arctic whaling logbook diverted…

Refugees

As the world grapples with a new pandemic, humanitarian organisations…

Development

Virtualising nature – an affront to the glory of the…

People

Boredom may be creeping into the lockdown experience. For the…

Refugees

A landmark ruling by the United Nations Human Rights Committee…

People

In today’s interconnected global society, new diseases can travel through…

Development

The best GIS dashboards record in near real-time the number…

Cultures

Geographical’s monthly print magazine has always sought to help its…

Cultures

As Iran and the US slog it out to dominate…