Calais and the push-pull of migration

  • Written by  Alexandria Innes
  • Published in Opinions
A group of men warm themselves around a fire in the Vandamme squat in Calais, France A group of men warm themselves around a fire in the Vandamme squat in Calais, France UNHCR / J. Pebrel
07 Aug
2015
The government's methods to limit access between Calais and the UK will fail for the simple reason that they are not responding to the motivations of the people trying to cross the channel

Go back a couple of months and the newspapers weren’t talking about Calais, they were talking about the Mediterranean.  Calais is now the crisis of the hour. It’s essentially the same story: in the Mediterranean people risked their lives to get to Europe, in Calais they do it to reach the UK. In fact, migrant boats have been crossing the Mediterranean since the early 2000s. The migrant camps at Calais have been there for over a decade. 

The strategies the government are taking to prevent entry to the UK through Calais include sniffer dogs, carbon dioxide detectors, heartbeat monitors and scanners to detect the presence of people hiding in vehicles that are making the crossing. The UK has built a reinforced fence to stop people accessing the entrance to the Channel Tunnel in France and David Cameron has recently sent 100 border guards to protect the entrance. 

Domestically, the government has implemented measures to reduce the attractiveness of the UK, including a new law that migrants without immigration status can be evicted without a court order. They have also reduced access to housing and subsistence for failed asylum seekers, that is, people who have found to be without a credible asylum claim but cannot be removed by the government because of conditions in their home country, lack of knowledge of their country of origin, or lack of diplomatic relations with their country of origin.

It is the push factors that need to be addressed, not the pull factors. Erecting barriers will only worsen the crisis

These methods are attempting to limit access by creating a barrier between Calais and the UK, and they are attempting to reduce incentives for migrants making the crossing. Both of these types of methods have failed elsewhere and will fail here for the very simple reason that they are not responding to the motivations of the people trying to cross, which are varied and cannot be simplified into economic incentives. Such methods are irresponsible, in that they make people vulnerable and destitute both within and outside of the UK and in doing so they empower organised criminal agents who help people cross borders increasingly risky situations.

The UK has an international obligation to recognise the right to seek asylum from persecution, established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the 1951 Refugee Convention, the 1967 Refugee Protocol, and in the various common asylum laws of the EU. The EU, in fact, has been developing the common asylum system since 1999, all the while increasing restrictions to access, through measures such as identifying safe ‘third countries’ on the borders of Europe, through which asylum seekers might pass or identifying transit countries. If a person enters a safe third country they must seek asylum there and cannot travel onward. The argument goes that even if a person was forced to migrate to a transit country or a safe third country, once there, migrants are essentially safe. If they choose to move onward they are no longer ‘forced’ migrants but are voluntary migrants, and thus cannot be considered ‘genuine’ asylum seekers.

In addition to these travel restrictions, EU visa processes require a higher standard of proof that the applicant has sufficient funds and no intent to remain when travelling from countries where ‘illegal immigration’ is likely. All of these methods are barrier methods of the type used at Calais. These are the measures that initially forced people into risky boats, shipping containers, and lorries.

14Syrian asylum-seekers sleep in front of a church in Calais, France (UNHCR / J. Pebrel)

Migrants at Calais might be trying to reach the UK for a number of reasons, some of which do not meet the Convention definition, which includes race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion. For example, the definition does not include people who are forced to flee conflict, environmental disaster or health crises (even though it probably should). Some migrants have family members in the UK and are trying to join them. Others speak the language.  Others know the UK has more racial, ethnic and religious diversity than many other European countries. Others have been in the UK before and want to return to a place they are familiar with.

People are complex and they have many reasons for wanting to reach the UK. They are not simply coming ‘to take our benefits’.  And regardless of whether they meet the Convention definition of a refugee, many people self-identify as asylum seekers. This is key. Limiting pull factors and erecting barriers to access do not deter asylum seekers and other forced migrants. Someone who self-identifies as an asylum seeker – as many of the migrants in Calais and the Mediterranean do – is pushed, not pulled, towards Europe or the UK.

Thus, it is the push factors that need to be addressed, not the pull factors. Limiting pull factors and erecting barriers will only worsen the crisis in Calais. We might stop talking about it, but the crisis endures, as it has for over a decade already. Barrier methods might serve temporary goals, but do nothing to address the problem long term.

Alexandria J. Innes is a lecturer of International Relations at the University of East Anglia

Share this story...

Submit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to Twitter

Related items

Geographical Week

Get the best of Geographical delivered straight to your inbox every Friday.

Subscribe Today

EDUCATION PARTNERS

Aberystwyth UniversityUniversity of GreenwichThe University of Winchester

TRAVEL PARTNERS

Ponant

Silversea

Travel the Unknown

DOSSIERS

Like longer reads? Try our in-depth dossiers that provide a comprehensive view of each topic

  • The Air That We Breathe
    Cities the world over are struggling to improve air quality as scandals surrounding diesel car emissions come to light and the huge health costs of po...
    Diabetes: The World at Risk
    Diabetes is often thought of as a ‘western’ problem, one linked to the developed world’s overindulgence in fatty foods and chronic lack of physi...
    National Clean Air Day
    For National Clean Air Day, Geographical brings together stories about air pollution and the kind of solutions needed to tackle it ...
    The Nuclear Power Struggle
    The UK appears to be embracing nuclear, a huge U-turn on government policy from just two years ago. Yet this seems to be going against the grain globa...
    REDD+ or Dead?
    The UN-backed REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) scheme, under which developing nations would be paid not to cut dow...

MORE DOSSIERS

NEVER MISS A STORY - follow Geographical

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.

More articles in OPINIONS...

Opinions

Earlier this month, an international sustainability conference brought together 400…

Opinions

On the Southern edge of the remote Kongsfjorden (King’s Fjord)…

Opinions

Exploring outdoors and in different places is important throughout our…

Opinions

Something has gone badly wrong with our planet’s oceans. If…

Opinions

Taking a wider look at Brexit from a geography standpoint

Opinions

The blockade of imports into Qatar by its Gulf neighbours…

Opinions

Is it time for a new and radical approach to alleviating…

Opinions

Plastic-free aisles in our local supermarkets may just be key…

Opinions

As reports of tourists being fed dog meat in Bali…

Opinions

The idea of rewilding boar into the UK’s landscapes is…

Opinions

2017 is the Chinese year of the chicken. This year, the…

Opinions

Despite the many claims of authenticity, modern filmmaking is still…

Opinions

With medical (and especially dental) tourism on the rise, Vitali…

Opinions

More drugs than you might think are derived from, or…

Opinions

The growth of cities is one of the defining challenges…

Opinions

On a long-awaited return to Ukraine, Vitali Vitaliev finds a…

Opinions

The world is changing, but one thing stays the same…

Opinions

We live in an age where awe and wonder at the…

Opinions

$150million. That is the estimated black market value of the…

Opinions

How many other species do we share our planet with?…