The G7 take on climate finance

  • Written by  Smita Nakhooda and Charlene Watson
  • Published in Opinions
Leaders of the G7 countries during negotiations in Bonn, Germany Leaders of the G7 countries during negotiations in Bonn, Germany Bundesregierung/Kugler
12 Jun
2015
While those in Bonn seem optimistic about the negotiating sessions that form the mid-point towards the Paris climate deal in December, governments must ramp up commitments to long-term finance to inject real energy into the process

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s call for the G7 climate negotiations in Bonn to get serious on the $100billion to support climate action in developing countries comes at a welcome time.

The $100billion refers to the commitments that industrialised countries made to mobilise each year under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This is not all about development assistance, it also includes a mix of other public and private finance, although what exactly counts as climate finance remains contentious.

Instead of begrudgingly creeping towards meeting their commitments, countries should embrace climate finance as a good investment. It is increasingly clear that low-carbon economic development is compatible with more equitable growth and poverty eradication. Climate finance can also avoid locking developing countries into a future of dead-end, fossil fuel-dependent assets.

Mobilising such resources may present a challenge for countries in the throes of austerity at home, but if we want continued global prosperity – not to mention an end to poverty – we have to find the money.

The solution isn't just to raise new money, but to phase out high-carbon investments

Deliberations on long-term finance at Bonn did not tackle the question of reaching the $100billion target – discussions were about scaling up and accessing adaptation finance – but they implicitly helped to make this point. Adaptation finance builds resilience to climate change, but it can also build resilience to other non-climate related shocks.

The Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Facility, for example, offers insurance solutions that go beyond climate risk, and provides vulnerable countries with risk management tools that impact wider production, investment and consumption decisions. These solutions, as part of greater investments in resilience and disaster risk reduction, are attracting growing attention.

The G7 communiqué commits to extend access to direct or indirect insurance cover against climate-related hazards for up to 400 million people, and support further development of early warning systems. It isn’t yet clear how these goals might be achieved as part of wider efforts to strengthen resilience and manage disaster risk.

merkelAngela Merkel presents at the G7 in Bonn, Germany (Image: Bundesregierung/Steins)

As the host of the G7 Summit, Germany has sent an important signal on long-term finance in the lead up to the Paris negotiations. We now need to see a wider role for finance in implementing a new climate agreement. Estimates of how much money will be needed to get to a low-carbon, climate-resilient global economy are much, much higher – in the trillions.

The solution isn’t just to raise new money, but to phase out high-carbon investments. The renewed commitment to phase out fossil fuels and reform export credits to support climate action are welcome steps to this end. The commitment to expanding support for vulnerable countries in managing climate-related disaster risk is another step forward.

In practice, the $100billion figure is largely political, representing a commitment to solving a problem for which developed countries are mostly responsible. The communiqué affirms the $100billion goal and the central role of the Green Climate Fund in this context. But finding a practical way to meet this goal by Paris will be crucial. The G7 must now spell out how they will reach the target to inject much-needed trust and faith in a vital, but fragile process.

Smita Nakhooda is a Research Fellow and Charlene Watson is a Research Officer of the Climate and Environment programme at the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), where this article was originally posted.

Share this story...

Submit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to Twitter

Related items

Geographical Week

Get the best of Geographical delivered straight to your inbox every Friday.

Subscribe Today

EDUCATION PARTNERS

Aberystwyth UniversityUniversity of GreenwichThe University of Winchester

TRAVEL PARTNERS

Ponant

Silversea

Travel the Unknown

DOSSIERS

Like longer reads? Try our in-depth dossiers that provide a comprehensive view of each topic

  • The Air That We Breathe
    Cities the world over are struggling to improve air quality as scandals surrounding diesel car emissions come to light and the huge health costs of po...
    Diabetes: The World at Risk
    Diabetes is often thought of as a ‘western’ problem, one linked to the developed world’s overindulgence in fatty foods and chronic lack of physi...
    National Clean Air Day
    For National Clean Air Day, Geographical brings together stories about air pollution and the kind of solutions needed to tackle it ...
    The Nuclear Power Struggle
    The UK appears to be embracing nuclear, a huge U-turn on government policy from just two years ago. Yet this seems to be going against the grain globa...
    REDD+ or Dead?
    The UN-backed REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) scheme, under which developing nations would be paid not to cut dow...

MORE DOSSIERS

NEVER MISS A STORY - follow Geographical

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.

More articles in OPINIONS...

Opinions

Earlier this month, an international sustainability conference brought together 400…

Opinions

On the Southern edge of the remote Kongsfjorden (King’s Fjord)…

Opinions

Exploring outdoors and in different places is important throughout our…

Opinions

Something has gone badly wrong with our planet’s oceans. If…

Opinions

Taking a wider look at Brexit from a geography standpoint

Opinions

The blockade of imports into Qatar by its Gulf neighbours…

Opinions

Is it time for a new and radical approach to alleviating…

Opinions

Plastic-free aisles in our local supermarkets may just be key…

Opinions

As reports of tourists being fed dog meat in Bali…

Opinions

The idea of rewilding boar into the UK’s landscapes is…

Opinions

2017 is the Chinese year of the chicken. This year, the…

Opinions

Despite the many claims of authenticity, modern filmmaking is still…

Opinions

With medical (and especially dental) tourism on the rise, Vitali…

Opinions

More drugs than you might think are derived from, or…

Opinions

The growth of cities is one of the defining challenges…

Opinions

On a long-awaited return to Ukraine, Vitali Vitaliev finds a…

Opinions

The world is changing, but one thing stays the same…

Opinions

We live in an age where awe and wonder at the…

Opinions

$150million. That is the estimated black market value of the…

Opinions

How many other species do we share our planet with?…