The windy isles

The windy isles EOLICSA
06 Aug
2016
The Galápagos islands take steps towards a fossil fuel-free future, as San Cristóbal’s wind and solar capacity is significantly expanded

On 16 January 2001, the tanker Jessica was delivering 240,000 gallons of diesel and intermediate fuel oil to a dispatch station on Baltra Island, Galápagos Islands, when it ran aground on Wreck Bay, San Cristóbal. Fuel began gushing from a tear in the ship’s hull, a serious threat to the sensitive ecosystem. Only the quick actions of the US coast guard and some favourable sea currents prevented the incident turning into a major environmental disaster.

It was the perfect illustration of the risks the islands were running on a regular basis, shipping large quantities of diesel over from the mainland in order to keep the then 18,000 (now 30,000) inhabitants’ lights on, and why, for several years, the government of Ecuador had been developing a project to begin construction of renewable energy sources on San Cristóbal, the second-largest of the islands. Completed in 2007, the San Cristóbal Wind Project (SCWP) now consists of three 51m-tall wind turbines and a pair of solar panels, which are estimated to have saved 8.7 million litres of diesel and 21,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions over the last eight years and currently supply 30 per cent of the island’s energy needs.

Wind farms will not be more detrimental to petrels than other existing man-made structures

Now plans are afoot for a major expansion to the current operation, with the ultimate goal being the elimination of fossil fuels from the energy supply entirely. The plan is to meet the anticipated 60 per cent increase in electricity demand by 2024 by erecting a fourth turbine, alongside greater solar capacity and a battery storage system.

One concern in relation to the SCWP is whether additional wind turbines could have an adverse effect on the isolated bird populations of the 19 islands, including the famous blue-footed booby and the endemic Galápagos petrel, listed as ‘critically endangered’ by the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). A 2010 study by scientists affiliated with the Charles Darwin Foundation determined that ‘wind farms will not be more detrimental to petrels than other existing man-made structures’, largely thanks to the turbines being located on a hill known as El Tropezón, an agricultural area distant from nesting sites. No petrels are known to have been injured by wind turbines during the past eight years, however the study did propose the implementation of a monitoring program, to assess long-term effects.

This was published in the August 2016 edition of Geographical magazine.

Share this story...

Submit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to Twitter

Related items

Leave a comment

ONLY registered members can leave comments and each comment is held pending authorisation before publishing. Please login or register to voice your opinion.

EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the best stories from Geographical delivered straight to your inbox each week.

Subscribe Today

EDUCATION PARTNERS

Aberystwyth UniversityUniversity of GreenwichThe University of Winchester

TRAVEL PARTNERS

Ponant

Silversea

Travel the Unknown

DOSSIERS

Like longer reads? Try our in-depth dossiers that provide a comprehensive view of each topic

  • REDD+ or Dead?
    The UN-backed REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) scheme, under which developing nations would be paid not to cut dow...
    The true cost of meat
    As one of the world’s biggest methane emitters, the meat industry has a lot more to concern itself with than merely dietary issues ...
    Long live the King
    It is barely half a century since the Born Free story caused the world to re-evaluate humanity’s relationship with lions. A few brief decades later,...
    London: a walk in the park
    In the 2016 London Mayoral election, the city’s natural environment was high on the agenda. Geographical asks: does the capital has a green future, ...
    The Money Trail
    Remittance payments are a fundamental, yet often overlooked, part of the global economy. But the impact on nations receiving the money isn’t just a ...

MORE DOSSIERS

NEVER MISS A STORY - follow Geographical

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.

More articles in NATURE...

Geophoto

This winter has seen frequent storms and flooding hitting many…

Wildlife

The bison, Poland’s symbol of nature conservation, already faces controversial…

Wildlife

Wolves have arrived at a wildlife park in Devon as…

Climate

An unassuming beach in Denmark is absorbing record-breaking levels of…

Energy

The environmental cost of military activities is significant. Could new…

Wildlife

Latest figures suggest that there are more than twice as…

Tectonics

How does the proposed allocation of ‘Zealandia’ as an independent…

Wildlife

Is extinction forever? While most would assume that yes, extinction…

Geophoto

Wide-angle photography is perhaps the best way to recreate the…

Wildlife

New book aims to follow in the success of last…

Wildlife

With Queensland koala numbers in free-fall, a novel idea suggests…

Climate

Geographical’s regular look at the world of climate change. This…

Tectonics

Fears that volcano eruptions in Iceland are set to regularly…

Oceans

Now we can all experience diving to the deepest point…

Wildlife

The new President of the United States has a namesake…

Geophoto

17,000 photographs from over 50 countries have been whittled down…

Wildlife

Red squirrels are found to be afflicted with a stubborn…

Polar

The toll, as a response to melting sea ice, would…

Climate

Could rail be the sustainable long-distance freight transport the world…

Energy

Abandoned oil and gas wells in the US are leaking significant…