Our directory of things of interest

University Directory

Hotspot - Palestine

BDS campaigners call for pressure to be placed on Israel BDS campaigners call for pressure to be placed on Israel Ryan Rodrick Beiler
28 Dec
Klaus Dodds explores the complicated and highly geopoliticised realm of food product labelling

Several decades ago, the business of food labelling was a geopolitical issue. From the late 1950s onwards, shoppers were asked to look at labels and not buy South African fruit and wine.

The anti-apartheid consumer boycott campaign was not lifted until 1993, and this has all come back to the fore recently with the European Commission (EC) issuing new guidelines about labelling for products made in Israeli communities and for businesses based in the occupied territories of Palestine and Syria. Under the EC directive, agricultural and cosmetic products sold within the European Union must declare their place of origin.

The legal position of Israeli settlements in the West Bank is highly contentious, as readers will readily appreciate. The EU adopts the view that the settlements are illegal and that their continued existence represents a major barrier to an eventual two-state solution. This is a view not shared by Israel and Netanyahu was reportedly furious that the EC chose to focus on Israeli produce emanating from the occupied territories. Diplomatic relations are strained again because any decision to highlight words like ‘settlement’ is seen in Israel (and by its supporters) as a political and economic assault on the legality and continued existence of those very communities.

If products are not seen as coming from within the recognised sovereign territory of Israel, those items do not qualify for preferential access to EU markets

The products affected are largely fruit, vegetables, wine and olive oil. There would be a mandatory indication of origin – something like ‘product from West Bank (Israeli settlement)’ or ‘product from West Bank (Palestinian settlement)’ would be proposed henceforth. Previously there had been a voluntary scheme of indication of origin. The introduction of a mandatory process is significant if Israel wishes to continue to access the common market of the EU.

For Israel, it also means that if the products are not seen as coming from within the recognised sovereign territory of Israel, then those items do not qualify for preferential trade access to EU markets. This exclusionary clause has been in effect in some form or another since 2004. In other words, the EU believes that the arrangements that exist between itself and Israel only extend to the pre-1967 territorial boundaries of Israel. The occupied territories are not considered by those agreements. It inevitably means that this directive, while informing European consumers about place of origin, will also cost Israeli businesses money.

More broadly, the EU directive nourishes an ongoing debate about the role of boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel. Started in 2005, the campaign calls for pressure to be placed on Israel in retaliation for its continued occupied of territories. Arguments continue to rage about whether the BDS campaign is appropriate, efficacious, hypocritical and/or anti-Semitic. What is intriguing is that the EU regards the new labelling guidelines as ‘technical’ and more a matter of informing the EU consumer than being anything geopolitical. But in the febrile atmosphere of Israel/Palestine, Israel sees the matter as discrimination. Netanyahu compared it to the boycott of Jewish businesses in Nazi Germany in the 1930s.

The labelling directive might provoke further boycotting in order to register support of either Israel or Palestine businesses

This directive also means that products from the West Bank could be labelled ‘product from Palestine’ and could be seen as contributing to the promotion of Palestine as an independent nation-state with a functioning export economy. For supporters of Israel and Palestine, the labelling directive might provoke further boycotting or paradoxically determination to buy these goods in order to register their support of either Israel or Palestine businesses operating in the occupied territories. Prime Minister Netanyahu, interestingly, warned that Palestinian workers employed in Israeli enterprises might have their job security imperilled if the latter become economically disadvantaged.

Klaus Dodds is Professor of Geopolitics at Royal Holloway, University of London and author of Geopolitics: A Very Short Introduction

This article was published in the January 2016 edition of Geographical magazine.

Related items

Geographical Week

Get the best of Geographical delivered straight to your inbox every Friday.



Subscribe to Geographical!

Adventure Canada


Aberystwyth University University of Greenwich The University of Winchester




Travel the Unknown


Like longer reads? Try our in-depth dossiers that provide a comprehensive view of each topic

  • National Clean Air Day
    For National Clean Air Day, Geographical brings together stories about air pollution and the kind of solutions needed to tackle it ...
    The Air That We Breathe
    Cities the world over are struggling to improve air quality as scandals surrounding diesel car emissions come to light and the huge health costs of po...
    Hung out to dry
    Wetlands are vital storehouses of biodiversity and important bulwarks against the effects of climate change, while also providing livelihoods for mill...
    When the wind blows
    With 1,200 wind turbines due to be built in the UK this year, Mark Rowe explores the continuing controversy surrounding wind power and discusses the e...
    Mexico City: boom town
    Twenty years ago, Mexico City was considered the ultimate urban disaster. But, recent political and economic reforms have transformed it into a hub of...


NEVER MISS A STORY - Follow Geographical on Social

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.